Skip to Content
A home for paediatricians. A voice for children and youth.
CPS

Nutritional evaluation of the neurologically impaired child

Posted: Mar 13, 2020


The Canadian Paediatric Society gives permission to print single copies of this document from our website. For permission to reprint or reproduce multiple copies, please see our copyright policy.

Principal author(s)

Linda M. Casey, Canadian Paediatric Society, Nutrition and Gastroenterology Committee

Paediatr Child Health 2020 25(2):125. (Abstract)

Abstract

Nutrition is of key importance in optimizing function and health in children with neurological impairment (NI). Challenges in quantifying individual needs and assessing nutritional status are barriers to determining the nutritional prescription. This practice point addresses common questions faced by clinicians caring for this population and uses available evidence to provide strategies to address these challenges.

Keywords: Assessment; Neurological impairment, Nutrition; Screening

Background

The tasks required for nutritional surveillance are the same for children with and without NI: nutritional screening and assessment. Common questions facing clinicians caring for children with NI are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Assessment tools and questions for evaluating nutritional status in children with NI
Task Objective Usual tools Questions

Screening

Identification of children at risk for nutrition-associated health issues who require detailed nutritional assessment.

  • Weight, height/length, head circumference plotted on growth charts
  • General health screening to identify causes or consequences of nutritional compromise
  • What is the best way to measure children with NI?
  • Should standard or specialized growth charts be used?
  • What patterns of growth suggest malnutrition?
  • Are there specific questions that help identify children with NI at risk for nutritional compromise?

Assessment

Identification of children with evidence of, or highly likely to develop, nutrition-associated health issues who require intervention.

  • Dietary history +/– nutrient analysis
  • Nutritional biochemistry
  • What are the nutritional requirements for children with NI?
  • Are there specific nutritional risks in the NI child?
  • What tools are most useful for assessing nutritional status?

Task: Screening

What is the best way to measure children with NI?

Weight measurement is a key element of standard paediatric care that can generally be performed in the office setting by using established techniques or by weighing caregiver and child together, then the caregiver alone, and calculating the difference. In contrast, height/length measurement may be impossible to obtain due to spasticity, contractures, or limited co-operation due to cognitive impairment. Body segment measurements (e.g., knee height, tibial length, ulnar length) correlate strongly with height/length and have been used to derive equations to predict height [1] or as a direct surrogate [2]-[5]. However, segmental body measures require specialized equipment, skills, and reference values which are often not readily available in the paediatrician’s office. Furthermore, while correlation is strong for group data, more recent analysis suggests that there are unacceptably wide differences between actual and predicted values for individuals [4]. Therefore, while length/height should be measured using standardized technique whenever possible, the use of segmental measures is not indicated.

Should standard or specialized growth charts be used?

What patterns of growth suggest malnutrition?

Growth charts are used to detect unusual patterns of growth, thereby targeting children for further assessment of health and/or nutritional status. Many congenital or genetic conditions are associated with slowed growth or small size. Using condition-specific growth charts typically results in fewer children being identified for further assessment. Condition-specific growth charts assume that altered growth is constitutional, but altered growth may also be caused by high-prevalence nutritional compromise, and both may occur together. In older children with Down Syndrome, for example, some evidence suggests that Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts for the general population more accurately identify children with high adiposity than DS-specific charts [6]. Although the use of standard growth charts in genetic or congenital conditions may over-identify children for further evaluation, this approach reduces the risk of missing individuals with a potentially modifiable growth impairment.

In conditions without a genetic basis, such as cerebral palsy (CP), growth patterns may be influenced significantly by clinical presentation as well as nutritional status. Recently developed growth charts specific to children with CP further describe the risk of morbidity, considering both weight and Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) score [7]. For children with GMFCS scores of I to IV and V without feeding tubes, those with weights below the 20th %ile experienced increased comorbidities compared with heavier children. Children in GMFCS categories I and II had a comorbidity hazard ratio of 2.2 if their weights were below the 5th %ile, while for children in GMFCS categories III to V, the mortality hazard ratio was 1.5 when their weights were below the 20th %ile. These charts are readily available online (http://www.lifeexpectancy.org/articles/newgrowthcharts.shtml) and may help clinicians to identify children who require additional evaluation and support.

Are there specific questions that help identify children with NI at risk for nutritional compromise?

Unlike typically developing (TD) children, NI children have a high prevalence of feeding challenges [8]-[13] that may ultimately lead to medical complications (e.g., chronic lung disease due to aspiration) or malnutrition. Greater motor impairment [14] and parental report of concerns about difficulty eating and drinking should alert clinicians to children with significant risk for oromotor or nutritional impairment. Specifically eliciting information about duration of feeds, feeding aversion, coughing or choking with feeds, recurrent pneumonia, or chronic chest symptoms should help identify children requiring further feeding and swallowing evaluation.

Task: Assessment

What are the nutritional requirements for children with NI?

Nutritional intake is assessed by comparing actual intake with expected requirements. As there are no specific intake recommendations for children with NI, intake goals are based on the needs of healthy TD children. During infancy, energy requirements are similar for all infants. The differential energy requirements between children with NI and their typical peers tends to widen with age, due mainly to differences in physical activity (PA) levels and body composition (e.g., muscle and bone mass) [16]. Equations have been developed to predict intake requirements, but data increasingly suggest that their predictive accuracy is insufficient for clinical use [17]. Somewhat limited data further suggest that energy requirements for children with NI may be 16% to 31% lower than for TD children, with lower requirements associated with greater degrees of impairment [16]. With this information in mind, clinicians must exercise clinical judgment regarding a child’s estimated energy requirements, monitor intake and issues, and adjust as needed. There is limited information regarding micronutrient needs in this population, but they are generally assumed to be comparable to those of TD children.

Are there specific nutritional risks in the NI child?

Children with reduced energy requirements may have associated insufficient micronutrient intake [18]-[20]. Children who require anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for seizure disorders may be at increased risk for specific micronutrient deficiency. Folate and vitamin B12 levels appear to be low in some children on AEDs, which may be associated with hyperhomocysteinemia [21] and increased long-term cardiovascular risk. Also, a large body of evidence has documented the association between prolonged AED use and impaired bone health, including greater risk for fracture, rickets, and osteomalacia [22][23]. The mechanisms are unclear and biochemical changes are inconsistent, but children with low energy intake for age or receiving AEDs should have regular monitoring of vitamin, mineral, and trace element levels, and receive supplements when indicated. Specific biochemical measures and testing intervals must be determined individually because no standard recommendations exist.

What tools are most useful for assessing nutritional status?

Growth can be considered as the sum of increases in fat mass (FM) and lean mass (LM) consisting of bone, muscle, and organs. Increases in LM occur with normal growth, while disproportionate increases in FM contribute to metabolic dysregulation and increased health risks. In children with NI, non-nutritional factors such as genetics and altered weight-bearing significantly impact the acquisition of LM and, thus, the relationship between nutrition and growth measurements. Weight is the indicator most commonly measured and tracked, but linear growth is more strongly correlated with accretion of lean tissue and organ (including brain) growth [24].

The challenges in measuring linear growth have led to the suggestion that body composition be included in the assessment of children with NI [25][26]. Although technology-based body composition tools (e.g., dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or bioimpedance analysis (BIA)) are accurate and relatively easy to use, they are not universally available. Estimation of body fat from skinfold (SF) measurements has been shown to be inaccurate in children with cerebral palsy (CP), likely due to altered distribution of body fat [27][28]. However, one study [29] has proposed modifications to equations based on two SF measurements that show good agreement with DEXA values [25][30], making this a reasonable option for use in the clinic setting. Although SF measurements are not routine in the paediatrician’s office, the technique is easily learned, can be reliably performed with practice, and requires only the purchase of a SF caliper, which is relatively inexpensive and available. The World Health Organization has prepared a training video demonstrating techniques for accurate measurement of all anthropometric measures, including SF, which is available online (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVcEZoCDV20).

Summary

  • Weight should be measured using standard techniques. Height should be measured using standard techniques if possible, but when impossible due to contractures, spasticity, or limited cooperation, segmental measures are not indicated.
  • For most conditions, the use of condition-specific growth charts does not improve the ability to identify children at risk for nutrition-related morbidity.
  • For children with CP, the use of GCFMS-specific growth charts (http://www.lifeexpectancy.org/articles/newgrowthcharts.shtml) may improve the ability to identify children at risk for nutrition-related morbidity or mortality.
  • Children with NI who have a history of oral aversion, long duration of feeds, feeding aversion, coughing or choking with feeds,  recurrent pneumonia, or chronic chest symptoms, should be evaluated for both nutritional compromise and feeding safety.
  • Energy requirements are similar to those of TD children during infancy, but decrease beyond the first year due to differences in PA and body composition. There is no accurate way to predict a child’s requirements. Individualized estimates followed by monitoring and adjustment as needed is the most effective approach.
  • Children with low energy intake for age or those receiving AEDs should have regular monitoring of vitamin, mineral, and trace element levels and supplementation when indicated.
  • Body composition assessment can add valuable information when monitoring the nutritional status of children with NI. For children with CP, this can be achieved using skinfold measurements and validated equations.

Acknowledgements

This practice point has been reviewed by the Hospital Paediatrics Section Executive, Community Paediatrics, and Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Committees of the Canadian Paediatric Society.


CANADIAN PAEDIATRIC SOCIETY NUTRITION AND GASTROENTEROLOGY COMMITTEE

Members: Linda M. Casey MD, Eddy Lau MD (Board Representative), Catherine M. Pound MD (Chair), Ana M. Sant’Anna MD, Pushpa Sathya MD, Christopher Tomlinson MB, ChB, PhD
Liaisons: Becky Blair MSc RD, Dietitians of Canada; Patricia D’Onghia MPH RD, Health Canada; Tanis R. Fenton PHD RD, Dietitians of Canada; Laura Haiek, Breastfeeding Committee for Canada; Deborah Hayward, Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Health Canada; Sarah Lawrence MD, Canadian Pediatric Endocrine Group
Principal author: Linda M. Casey MD


References

  1. Stevenson RD. Use of segmental measures to estimate stature in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995;149(6):658-62.
  2. Stallings VA, Charney EB, Davies JC, Cronk CE. Nutritional status and growth of children with diplegic or hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993;35(11):997-1006.
  3. Stallings VA, Charney EB, Davies JC, Cronk CE. Nutrition-related growth failure of children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993;35(2):126-38.
  4. Bell KL, Davies PS. Prediction of height from knee height in children with cerebral palsy and non-disabled children. Ann Hum Biol 2006;33(4):493-9.
  5. Kihara K, Kawasaki Y, Yagi M, Takada S. Relationship between stature and tibial length for children with moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy. Brain Dev 2015;37(9):853-7.
  6. Hatch-Stein JA, Zemel BS, Prasad D, et al. Body composition and BMI growth charts in children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics 2016;138(4):pii:20160541.
  7. Brooks J, Day S, Shavelle R, Strauss D. Low weight, morbidity, and mortality in children with cerebral palsy: New clinical growth charts. Pediatrics 2011;128(2):e299-307.
  8. Benfer KA, Weir KA, Bell KL, Ware RS, Davies PS, Boyd RN. Food and fluid texture consumption in a population-based cohort of preschool children with cerebral palsy: Relationship to dietary intake. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57(11):1056-63.
  9. Benfer KA, Weir KA, Bell KL, Ware RS, Davies PS, Boyd RN. Oropharyngeal dysphagia in preschool children with cerebral palsy: Oral phase impairments. Res Dev Disabil 2014;35(12):3469-81.
  10. Benfer KA, Weir KA, Bell KL, Ware RS, Davies PS, Boyd RN. Oropharyngeal dysphagia and gross motor skills in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 2013;131(5):e1553-62.
  11. Clancy KJ, Hustad KC. Longitudinal changes in feeding among children with cerebral palsy between the ages of 4 and 7 years. Dev Neurorehabil 2011;14(4):191-8.
  12. Dahlseng MO, Finbråten AK, Júlíusson PB, Skranes J, Andersen G, Vik T. Feeding problems, growth and nutritional status in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Paediatr 2012;101(1):92-8.
  13. Reilly HM, Martineau JK, Moran A, Kennedy H. Nutritional screening—Evaluation and implementation of a simple Nutrition Risk Score. Clin Nutr 1995;14(5):269-73.
  14. Weir KA, Bell KL, Caristo F, et al. Reported eating ability of young children with cerebral palsy: Is there an association with gross motor function? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94(3):495-502.
  15. Benfer KA, Weir KA, Ware RS, et al. Parent-reported indicators for detecting feeding and swallowing difficulties and undernutrition in preschool-aged children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2017;59(11):1181-7.
  16. Walker JL, Bell KL, Boyd RN, Davies PS. Energy requirements in preschool-age children with cerebral palsy. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96(6):1309-15.
  17. Penagini F, Borsani B, Bosetti A, et al. Resting energy expenditure in children with cerebral palsy: Accuracy of available prediction formulae and development of a population-specific formula. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2018;25:44-9.
  18. Hillesund E, Skranes J, Trygg KU, Bøhmer T. Micronutrient status in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Paediatr 2007;96(8):1195-8.
  19. Sullivan PB, Juszczak E, Lambert BR, Rose M, Ford-Adams ME, Johnson A. Impact of feeding problems on nutritional intake and growth: Oxford Feeding Study II. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002;44(7):461-7.
  20. Thommessen M, Heiberg A, Kase BF. Feeding problems in children with congenital heart disease: The impact on energy intake and growth outcome. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46(7):457-64.
  21. Paknahad Z, Chitsaz A, Zadeh AH, Sheklabadi E. Effects of common anti-epileptic drugs on the serum levels of homocysteine and folic acid. Int J Prev Med 2012;3(Suppl 1):186-90.
  22. Espinosa PS, Perez DL, Abner E, Ryan M. Association of antiepileptic drugs, vitamin D, and calcium supplementation with bone fracture occurrence in epilepsy patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011;113(7):548-51.
  23. Verrotti A, Coppola G, Parisi P, Mohn A, Chiarelli F. Bone and calcium metabolism and antiepileptic drugs. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010;112(1):1-10.
  24. Pfister KM, Ramel SE. Linear growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Clin Perinatol 2014;41(2):309-21.
  25. Finbråten AK, Martins C, Andersen GL, et al. Assessment of body composition in children with cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study in Norway. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57(9):858-64.
  26. Sullivan P. Measurement of body composition should become routine in nutritional assessment of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57(9):793-4.
  27. Kuperminc MN, Gurka MJ, Bennis JA, et al. Anthropometric measures: Poor predictors of body fat in children with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52(9):824-30.
  28. van den Berg-Emons RJ, van Baak MA, Westerterp KR. Are skinfold measurements suitable to compare body fat between children with spastic cerebral palsy and healthy controls? Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40(5):335-9.
  29. Gurka MJ, Kuperminc MN, Busby MG, et al. Assessment and correction of skinfold thickness equations in estimating body fat in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52(2):e35-41.
  30. Oeffinger DJ, Gurka MJ, Kuperminc M, Hassani S, Buhr N, Tylkowski C. Accuracy of skinfold and bioelectrical impedance assessments of body fat percentage in ambulatory individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2014;56(5):475-81.

Disclaimer: The recommendations in this position statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. Internet addresses are current at time of publication.

Last updated: Feb 8, 2024